I did. Which interests you more, the information or the journalist's inserted conclusions? When you read, can you separate the facts from something the author sticks in which is really not related to the article?
Nowadays it is impossible to just get the facts in "news." If it has anything to do with climate, at least 50% of the "information" will be the journalist telling us how to interpret these ideas and what to conclude about them. That's why media costs money. If they only printed the facts they'd be worth far less than they sell for.
I am the man who woke up and stayed awake, in a world of sleepers. If you're awake, keep watch with me. If you're asleep, see to it you don't come here or you'll see only nightmares.
2 comments:
"It may be that, rather like computers, our brains are becoming more efficient even as they grow smaller."
At least READ the article!
I did. Which interests you more, the information or the journalist's inserted conclusions? When you read, can you separate the facts from something the author sticks in which is really not related to the article?
Nowadays it is impossible to just get the facts in "news." If it has anything to do with climate, at least 50% of the "information" will be the journalist telling us how to interpret these ideas and what to conclude about them. That's why media costs money. If they only printed the facts they'd be worth far less than they sell for.
Post a Comment